I'm not really Stanley Lieber. - Son God [entries|archive|friends|userinfo] Stanley Lieber [ website | stanley. ] [ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ] [ archive | journal archive ]

Links [ Links: | archive comics flickr itrecords rss thegreen tumblr twitter vr www youtube ]

Son God [Mar. 4th, 2006|05:09 am] [ Tags | 1997, album, christianity, creative_commons, experimental, free, inri, itrecords, mp3, religion, son_god, stanleylieber, virtual_jesus ]   Son God 1997   01. The Word 02. The Eyes Have It 03. Again Together With The Celestial Disc 04. Never Again 05. George Rat 06. Christ Is 6 07. Virtual Jesus 08. The Duat Originally released September 12, 1997. From the liner notes: I still like this album and I refuse to make excuses for it. Edit: Click here for the lyrics. tracks permanently archived in multiple formats at archive.org creative.commons.attribution-noncommercial.2.5 * license Link Reply

Comments: From: dzima 2006-03-04 11:41 am (UTC) (Link) Don't post it now that I'm about to restart my recording sessions! Now I don't know what to do ;) (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 12:03 pm (UTC) (Link) This has been sitting in a box for nine years, it will be here when you get back! (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: cap_scaleman 2006-03-04 01:56 pm (UTC) (Link) Your earlier works have some kind of humour in them in my oppinion. Perhaps because you wheren't a pro with all kinds of gadgets back then. (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 08:04 pm (UTC) (Link) I was hugely influenced by myself: http://www.inri.net/zines/FUCK(tm) Up until about 2003 I was doing all my music under the name 'INRI' or 'Virtual Jesus,' which is referenced on this album. It was a whole different trip. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: cap_scaleman 2006-03-05 04:57 pm (UTC) (Link) Looks like we really need a "Stanleylieber inerview part 2". (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-05 11:03 pm (UTC) (Link) If you have stuff you want to ask me I'm game. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: cap_scaleman 2006-03-05 11:11 pm (UTC) (Link) I have nothing particular right now, I have an interview with Dzima that is soon ready to get up. Dunno when though(Thanks to school, argh!). (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: landruc 2006-03-04 03:08 pm (UTC) (Link) What here could use excusing? (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 08:02 pm (UTC) (Link) Well, it sounds like it's being listened to under water. I wrote those liner notes when first uploaded it to the Internet (circa 1999-2000), and I was a bit unnerved by how terrible all my tapes sounded, with regards to hiss, generation loss (from 4-track to 2-track stereo master) and general low fidelity. However, I like the songs. They even have lyrics! Some of which are embedded in the ID3 information of the MP3s... (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: nomorepolitics 2006-03-04 07:26 pm (UTC) (Link) So you've grown more confident with all the positive feedback? (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 08:07 pm (UTC) (Link) I'm not sure what zapped the initial upload of these tracks. By process of elimination it must have been the Creative Commons upload client. I followed the exact same steps (minus the Creative Commons upload client) and now the MP3s are accessible by everyone. This post is identical to the first one (now removed). I don't know if I would say I've grown more confident. In some ways it's more difficult now to make music without considering how people are going to 'take' it. In the old days I had no listeners so that was never an issue. :) Although I have to say it is kind of interesting to see what people think about this old stuff. At the time it was made no one I gave it to would even comment. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: nomorepolitics 2006-03-04 08:22 pm (UTC) (Link) I couldn't tell you what I think the problem was. I have a bunch of special, rare, and i****** applications and codecs on my computers, which help bypass incompatibility problems. For the most part, I try not to use either microsoft or macintosh software, when I can get away with it. This is great for the receiving end. But probably, if I was producing stuff for other people, they would have trouble playing it. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 09:31 pm (UTC) (Link) By the way, thanks for your comments on the other thread. It's great that someone has finally listened to this stuff. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: dzima 2006-03-04 10:07 pm (UTC) (Link) I like number 3 and 5 the best. (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 10:12 pm (UTC) (Link) Thanks. I sure wish I hadn't lost the lyrics to 3. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: cheapsurrealist 2006-03-04 10:10 pm (UTC) (Link) Thanks for reformating. The audio quality seems to be much better. Maybe it's just Realplayer vs. QT (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-04 10:14 pm (UTC) (Link) Evidently the Creative Commons publisher client inserts the metadata in strange places. Everything is encoded at the same bitrate this time but I agree, it sounds better now. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) From: anglerfish96 2006-03-08 06:22 am (UTC) (Link) I liked this a lot. The lyrics are quite good! (Reply) (Thread) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-08 07:32 am (UTC) (Link) Thank you! (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Deleted comment) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-09 08:18 pm (UTC) (Link) It is a signpost of our age that I cannot determine if you are being sarcastic or not. (Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Deleted comment) From: stanleylieber 2006-03-10 05:11 am (UTC) (Link) One has to be ever vigilant! (Reply) (Parent) (Thread)